PM defends decision not to disclose Southport killer’s violent history and promises to tackle ‘new threat’ in UK…reports Asian Lite News
In a decisive move, Downing Street has announced plans to overhaul UK terrorism laws, aiming to ensure lone killers committing extreme acts of violence are charged with terrorism offences. This change follows the case of Axel Rudakubana, who is responsible for the brutal deaths of three young girls in Southport, an incident that has shaken the nation. The Prime Minister confirmed that a public inquiry would be held to investigate the state’s failures, which allowed Rudakubana—whose violent tendencies had been known—to carry out one of the most horrific attacks on children in recent British history.
Rudakubana’s attack on the three young girls, Bebe King (6), Alice da Silva Aguiar (9), and Elsie Dot Stancombe (7), has reignited the debate on the legal definitions of terrorism. The tragedy highlighted the growing concern over the rise of so-called ‘lone-wolf’ attackers—individuals whose actions, while often driven by personal obsessions with violence, lack any coherent ideological motive but still cause widespread fear and devastation.
The proposed law change would enable individuals like Rudakubana, who have a history of violent tendencies and who attempt to produce deadly substances such as ricin, to be charged with terrorism offences, even if their actions do not align with the traditional forms of terrorism associated with organized groups. The move comes after Rudakubana was referred to the government’s anti-radicalisation programme, Prevent, three times before the attack but was not considered dangerous enough for intervention.
Keir Starmer strongly defended the government’s decision to push for these changes. In a press conference at No 10, Starmer acknowledged that terrorism, as it is currently understood, is evolving. “The nature of terrorism has changed,” he said, emphasizing that the law needs to catch up with the new threat posed by lone attackers. He pointed to the growing number of erratic, mass murders seen not just in the UK, but also across the world, including in the US, as proof that the current legal framework is insufficient for addressing the complexity of these new types of violent incidents.
“This is not what we would have traditionally thought of as terrorism when the definitions were drawn up,” Starmer said. “But looking at the facts of this case, it’s clearly extreme violence. It’s clearly intended to terrorize, and that is my view. Most people would say the same.”
Rudakubana’s background has further fueled calls for an urgent reassessment of how the UK government and its agencies deal with individuals exhibiting violent behavior. The 17-year-old had been obsessed with violent ideologies and had previously attempted to produce ricin—one of the most lethal toxins known to man. He also downloaded a training manual associated with al-Qaida, which raised alarms about his potential for mass violence. Despite these warning signs, he was not flagged as a serious threat in time to prevent the attack.
The government has been under significant scrutiny for its handling of the case, particularly after the police and other authorities initially dismissed the possibility that the murders could be linked to terrorism. Online activists and some opposition politicians were quick to criticize the government for downplaying the incident, given the nature of the violence and the extreme preparation involved in the attack.
While acknowledging these concerns, Starmer stood by the decision not to disclose details about Rudakubana’s violent history, stressing that revealing information prematurely could have jeopardized the trial. “If this trial had collapsed because crucial details were revealed while the police were still investigating, the vile individual who committed these crimes would have walked away a free man. The prospect of justice would have been destroyed for the victims and their families,” he explained.
Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, too, emphasized that he had been bound by the law in withholding this information. “It was not my personal decision to withhold these details,” he said. “It was the law of the land, which we all have to observe.”
Despite Rudakubana’s age at the time of the attack, which prevents a whole-life sentence, he will receive a life sentence when he is sentenced on Thursday. The law will not allow him to be given a whole-life term, as he was 17 at the time of the murders. However, the government has pledged to change the law to ensure that those responsible for such extreme acts of violence can be treated as terrorists, regardless of their age or whether they were acting as part of an organized group.
The Prime Minister also acknowledged that the failure to properly assess Rudakubana’s potential for violence was a “clear misjudgment” that resulted in the tragic deaths of three young girls. He further stressed that this case should serve as a “line in the sand” for Britain—a catalyst for a fundamental change in how the country addresses the growing threat of extreme violence.
As part of the government’s response, a public inquiry will be conducted to explore the failures in identifying and preventing Rudakubana’s attack. The inquiry will examine the broader issue of the easy access to extreme violent content online, which has been linked to several high-profile attacks. Starmer has called for a review of the accessibility of such content, highlighting that some violent material remains on social media platforms, despite being flagged for removal. He suggested that this issue is central to the evolving nature of terrorism and violence in the modern world.
“People can access horrific videos with just a few clicks, and some of these videos never get taken down,” Starmer said. “That cannot be right.”
Alongside the public inquiry, the government will also launch a series of reviews on its counter-extremist strategies, including the Prevent programme. The reviews will be led by senior legal figures, including David Anderson, who has been appointed as the independent commissioner for Prevent. Starmer’s spokesperson confirmed that there would be a review of the legal framework surrounding terrorism, with additional details expected to be revealed by Home Secretary Yvette Cooper.
In the wake of the Southport murders, both the government and opposition are calling for swift action to address the dangers posed by lone actors with extreme tendencies, urging the need for legal reforms and a more robust response to the new and emerging threats of terrorism.
ALSO READ: Starmer Lauds Trump as World Leaders Celebrate His Return
